I wonder why Dr Lottaz employs so much invective against EU countries but has difficulty uttering anything critical about Russia, whose own colonialism and imperialism equals that of any other European country? Moreover Russia is at present engaged in the most imperialistic and violent episode in Europe since WWII. Lottaz often finds justification for Russia's going to war because of a perceived threat from a growing NATO but roundly criticises the EU countries for simply increasing defence spending in the face of an obvious Russian threat, and after the US has signalled retreat from Europe. He definitely is not neutral in his handling of the EU and Russia.
I wonder why Dr Lottaz employs so much invective against EU countries but has difficulty uttering anything critical about Russia, whose own colonialism and imperialism equals that of any other European country? Moreover Russia is at present engaged in the most imperialistic and violent episode in Europe since WWII. Lottaz often finds justification for Russia's going to war because of a perceived threat from a growing NATO but roundly criticises the EU countries for simply increasing defence spending in the face of an obvious Russian threat, and after the US has signalled retreat from Europe. He definitely is not neutral in his handling of the EU and Russia.
He really should have tried harder to amplify your biases.
I agree: if the man claims to be neutral, he should voice the biases of all sides